UA-17470720-3

Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

iOS 9: support for STV 3.4.2

core-data general

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 mgcds

mgcds

    Jr. Member

  • STV Lite
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
Reputation: 1
Good

Posted 09 July 2015 - 10:57 AM

Hello all,

my app is using STV 3.4.2 and i´m quite happy with it. It mostly uses the core data binding functionalty. Since iOS 9 is coming i would like to know if some methods in 3.4.2, specially the ones related to the core data bindings will get deprecated or if you can foresee other problems that may force me ultimately to upgrade to STV 4.

 

Thank you.

Cheers

Max


  • Adjuramum likes this

#2 Tarek

Tarek

    Forum Admin

  • Administrators
  • 3670 posts
Reputation: 452
Popular

Posted 09 July 2015 - 11:01 AM

Hi Max,

 

Your app should work fine as it is, and you don't need to upgrade to STV 4 (or the upcoming 5) in order for your app to support iOS 9. Having said that, we'll be soon dropping support for STV 3.x with the release of STV 5.0 (in about a month from now).



#3 mgcds

mgcds

    Jr. Member

  • STV Lite
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
Reputation: 1
Good

Posted 09 July 2015 - 11:06 AM

Hi Tarek,

 

thank you very much!

 

Cheers



#4 Tarek

Tarek

    Forum Admin

  • Administrators
  • 3670 posts
Reputation: 452
Popular

Posted 09 July 2015 - 11:07 AM

You're most welcome Max :)



#5 gayraud

gayraud

    Jr. Member

  • STV 5.0 Pro
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 30 September 2015 - 02:59 AM

I am digging up this topic since I am also using STV 3.4.2 and since IOS9 is out, my project is not working as expected.

Compilation is still working (despite a couple of warnings) but when I run the application the STV Master/Detail does not work.

Indeed the list of items is showing OK, but when I click on the cell, the detail view is showing a blank page.

 

How can I fix that ?







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: core-data, general

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users